Held Hostage By The Lunatic Fringe


Once again America is held in the limbo of stagnation by the lunatic fringe who feel obligated to find the most isolated and polarizing issues to focus the national debate while serenely ignoring the more pressing threats to our existence.

It is a sad and tragic reality in today’s America that rational thought and productive debate are outlawed by a sub-culture of radicals who dictate the direction of national discussion by forcing the vast majority, who have no real stake in the topic, to bow to the alter of the latest media cycle.

Last month it was whether or not we should eat chicken sandwiches sold by someone opposed to homosexual marriage.  Before that it was “how dare you restrict my ability to purchase an assault rifle!” And now it’s all about abortion, or to be more precise, abortion for those victimized by rape.

Rome burns, the Titanic sinks and we spend our time worrying about the color of the fire engine and the deck chair ensemble. 

And we wonder how we ever managed to allow ourselves to fall into a world where we drop hundreds of billions of dollars a year on a foreign war we forget we’re in, accept 8% unemployment as normal, have 50% of the population on some sort of government assistance, annually spend $1.9 Trillion more than we take in and adopt a health care policy which does nothing to address either health nor cost all while the cliff of reality speeds ever closer.

We have some very serious realities facing our future and yet we cannot even begin to open the discussion because the radical wing-nuts of the far left and right won’t allow it.  Changes to Medicare?  Social Security?  Just try to mention it and doors slam, ears are plugged and the childish refrain of ‘La-la-la-la…I can’t hear you!’ shrieks back. 

Today, and for what will probably amount to the next 36 to 72 hours we’ll bicker back and forth about the most devastating threat to national security since the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.  What’s that?  A Stuxnet virus launched against our power grid? 

No, it’s abortion.  The holy of holies of when it comes to grid-locking progress. 

Look, I don’t pretend to get it.  I’m not a woman, it’s not my body and I don’t understand the whole “It’s a choice thing” argument.  Does life begin at conception?  I don’t know and to be honest I don’t really care.  To me the abortion rant is hijacked by those on the far sides of the debate who want nothing more than to hear their own voices clog the forum. 

For me, the abortion issue has never been about an unplanned pregnancy, a women’s right to choose or where life begins.  To me it’s all about an unwanted child and what should we do about that?  I have never heard a Pro-Life solution for what should be done once the ‘miracle’ is born.  What happens then?  What do you do with a child born into a world where the mother doesn’t want it?  And before we quick-puke the response of adoption please illustrate how that process is governed, funded and overseen. 

But we can’t have that debate can we?  Pro-Lifers might believe life begins at conception but it doesn’t have much of a plan once the birth occurs. 

Pro-Life is Pro-Life and if you don’t think like me then I had better scream louder.  Oh, and like much of what we “intelligently discuss” in the public forum these days it’s all 100%, no debate, everything-all-the-time, no exceptions so carry on and keep on moving because we know what’s best for you. 

Now before you unfurl your Pro Choice colors and rally in a unified chant could it be remotely possible to entertain the concept that abortion should maybe not be used as the primary source of birth control?  I mean, an ‘unplanned pregnancy’ should not have to be the definitive moment of someone’s life but is it possible to perhaps put a little more thought into what we’re doing once the lights are dimmed and the consequences of those actions? 

Oh, sorry.  I forgot.  We can’t have the rational debate because we lost our collective rationality back in the Johnson Administration…you gotta respect my rights even if they infringe on yours…

What if the woman is raped though?  And a pregnancy results?  Surely then there can be an exception from the divine rule, right? 

Hell no! 

So this is where we are today.  Arguing about whether abortion should be allowed for those who are victimized by the most brutal crime known to the human race.  Again, we’re not going to talk about what we’ll do with an unwanted child because we can never get that far into the debate and to compromise or rationalize on a case by case basis is simply ludicrous because we live in a world where there’s only one way and that’s the right way and it works every single time…

Here’s a side note about how we roll in America these days.  There was an argument a few years back about smoking on public beaches in Massachusetts and one person was adamantly opposed to the idea.  No cigarettes at any time on any beach for anyone he railed.  Okay, I see your point.  But then it was asked of him ‘Do you even go to the beach?’  No, he didn’t like sand…so even though there’s a topic about which you have absolutely zero personal involvement in you’re still going to levy an opinion about how others should be forced to behave?

See where I’m going?

Let’s talk about rape for a second.  It’s bad.  And yet it does happen.  Wish it wouldn’t but it does.  It happens about 90,000 times a year in the United States according to the most radical statistics.  Pregnancies resulting from rape are calculated at the extreme far edge to be at 5%.  This means in the most wildest of scenarios there are about 4,500 pregnancies resulting from rape in the US each year. 

Now I don’t mean to diminish the pain buried within these statistics.  Each case carries with it a life altering set of circumstances.  But I am trying to illustrate how we, as a nation, are killing ourselves by focusing our resources and energies on issues which affect very tiny segments of the overall population.

There are 314,159,000 citizens in the United States today.  Should we spend our energies looking at the population as a whole or at the smaller percentage?  I’m not saying we ignore them just like I’m not saying we ignore the unemployed, the uninsured, the elderly, the veterans, the immigrants, the unhealthy, the incarcerated, the uneducated or even the unlucky but since the forecast for all of us is fairly bleak at the present time could it be possible to direct our attentions towards the greater solution in an effort to plug the dike so we don’t all drown in the end?

The ship is sinking, America.  Our entitlement programs, debt and collective refusal to open a conversation about compromised solutions threatens us all.  It’s time we band together and unite to seek solutions.  We cannot afford to allow the lunatic fringe of the far left and right to steer the ship any longer.